Elon Musk has escalated his legal battle against OpenAI, filing for a preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The motion targets OpenAI, its co-founders, key collaborators like Microsoft, and figures including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Microsoft VP Dee Templeton, and investor Reid Hoffman. Musk’s filing alleges anticompetitive practices and conflicts of interest that could harm his AI company, xAI, and the broader marketplace.
Musk's attorneys argue that OpenAI’s actions, combined with self-dealing by Altman and others, jeopardize fair competition and harm the public interest. They allege these practices violate the spirit of OpenAI’s founding mission to advance AI for humanity, which Musk supported with a $44 million donation. Musk’s camp claims “irreparable harm” will result if an injunction isn’t granted, stating:
“An injunction to preserve what is left of OpenAI’s nonprofit character, free from self-dealing, is the only appropriate remedy.”
An OpenAI spokesperson dismissed Musk’s filing as baseless, stating:
“Elon’s fourth attempt, which again recycles the same baseless complaints, continues to be utterly without merit.”
OpenAI previously sought to dismiss Musk’s earlier suits, describing them as “blusterous.”
The motion for an injunction seeks to halt OpenAI’s governance transition and self-dealing activities until the lawsuit's resolution. A ruling against OpenAI could have significant implications for its operations, investor confidence, and market position.
As the legal battle intensifies, this case highlights growing tensions in the AI sector, where the race for dominance is increasingly marred by disputes over ethics, governance, and competition.